For years, the conventional wisdom was that sports would never move to streaming. Live games needed linear TV. The bundle needed sports. The whole architecture of pay TV was built around that assumption, and the people who ran it believed it with the confidence of people who had never been wrong about anything important.

Last year, Amazon drew 13M viewers per game on Thursday Night Football. ESPN drew 15M on Monday Night Football and fell 14% in a single season.

Sports are moving to streaming. It is not a debate.

The only question worth asking now is how fast. And the data has an answer for that, too. Sports is running about seven years behind the rest of television. Entertainment made the move. News is making it. Sports is next, on a schedule, whether the industry accepts it or not.

Linear TV is on life support. The ventilator is sports.

And the ventilator is leaving.

Let's break it down into 3 big questions:
1) What share of TV time does sports currently account for?
2) What share of sports time is streaming?
3) Why does it matter for ads?

Director’s note: For this issue, I took two existing data sources and projected them out into the 2030s:
1) Sports' share of TV viewing (Nielsen)
2) Streaming's share of sports TV ad spend (eMarketer)

What share of TV time does sports currently account for?

Sports now account for 22% of all linear TV viewing, up from 13% in 2021.

But the more important number is what happens when you zoom out to all of TV, not just linear. Sports' share of convergent TV time (streaming plus linear combined) is growing steadily.

Sports' share of convergent TV time:
1) 2025 - 21%
2) 2030 - 27%
3) 2035 - 31%

As the overall TV pie shifts from linear to streaming, sports claim an ever-larger slice.

What share of sports time is streaming?

To put sports in context, here is where the broader streaming shift stands. I have been tracking it in four steps:
1) 2025 - More people reachable on streaming than linear TV
2) 2026 - People spend more time on streaming than linear TV ← YOU ARE HERE
3) 2028 - Ad money flips ← 2027?
4) 2030 - Streaming gets more ad impressions than linear TV

For most of TV, this transition is well underway. Sports is the exception, running about seven years behind.

Streaming share of sports viewing:
1) 2025 - 14%
2) 2030 - 29%
3) 2035 - 60%

Director’s note: Linear TV and streaming carry roughly the same CPM for sports, which allows streaming's share of ad spend to serve as a reasonable proxy for share of viewing time.

Sports is 7 years behind: In 2017, streaming hit 13% of all TV time. Sports hit that same number in 2024.

Why this matters: Streaming’s share of sports viewing will likely cross 50% around 2033 or 2034, seven to eight years after the rest of TV.

Why I'm bullish on this going faster: The base of people who watch sports on streaming is growing quickly and will surpass linear viewership within a few years.

Share of sports viewers who watch via streaming (Activate):
1) 2022 - 41%
2) 2024 - 60% (↑ 46%)

Last year, Amazon delivered 88% of the audience for Thursday Night Football that ESPN/ABC did for Monday Night Football, and Amazon is paying 53% less per viewer in media rights than ESPN. By 2029, Amazon's NFL coverage could outdraw ESPN entirely.

The big picture: Combining the two models (sports' growing share of TV and streaming's rising share of sports) produces a striking picture of where growth is concentrated.

Change in share of convergent TV time (2025-35):
1) Sports (streaming) - ↑ 536%
2) Non-sports (streaming) - ↑ 9%
3) Sports (linear) - ↓ 31%
4) Non-sports (linear) - ↓ 43%

Why does it matter for ads?

Follow the trajectory of sports in advertising, and the picture sharpens further.

Sports’ share of convergent TV ad spend (eMarketer):
1) 2025 - 20%
2) 2030 - 27%

Sports is gaining share of the overall TV ad market, while the overall market is shifting to streaming. The two forces compound: more sports content, more of it on streaming, commanding a larger share of ad dollars.

Bottom line

The future of television isn't entertainment. It's sports.

For decades, sports were the crown jewel that helped broadcasters sell everything else. The NFL made sitcoms more valuable. March Madness made cable bundles more valuable. Live sports subsidized the rest of television.

That relationship is reversing. Increasingly, entertainment exists to support sports, not the other way around. The most important chart in this newsletter may be the simplest one: sports' share of TV viewing continues to rise while virtually every other category loses relevance.

The winners won't necessarily be the companies with the best content libraries. They'll be the companies with the strongest sports portfolios and the balance sheets to keep acquiring rights.

Netflix understands this. Amazon understands this. Disney has understood it for decades.

Sports is no longer a category. It's ground zero for the future of television.

And the next decade of media will be a race to own it.

Reply

Avatar

or to participate

Keep Reading